Thursday, January 21, 2010

Spineless Democrats and free-for-all corporate campaign spending

A Republican won the seat that Ted Kennedy held for many years. What does this tell us? 1. People in Massachusetts like a good-looking senator, 2. People in Massachssetts don't like someone who seems to be clueless, 3. Unlike the rest of the country, people in Massachusetts don't think that their senate seat is a national one, 4. People in Massachusetts already have a robust, consumer-oriented health care system and don't seem to think it matters who represents them in the Senate.

Harsh? Maybe. But the Democrats seemed to think that all they had to do was offer a candidate and they were done. Why Rahm Emmanuel wasn't personally overseeing who ran Coakley's campaign is beyond me. She is obviously a smart, hard-working woman; she just didn't know how to campaign to replace the most likeable man in the Senate.

And let's face it. The Democrats need to grow up and get a little backbone. It is not like the election of Scott Brown tipped the majority in the Senate to 51-49. The Democrats still have 59 votes. Change the rules of the Senate, and go ahead and pass legislation. Waiting for the Republicans to cooperate, after they have stated time and again that they have no intention to, is naive and gives them the power. Democrats have the majority: Use it.

Barack Obama cannot single-handedly solve all the problems facing this country. He needs a little help from House and Senate Democrats who are willing to put principal over their own re-election.

However, that is probably not going to happen. Now that the Supreme Court has somewhat inexplicably ruled that corporations, including foreign ones, can contribute without restriction to campains, we will see anyone who wants to be elected pander even more than they already do to their big-money donors.

Happy New Year.

No comments: